In third grade I dissected owl pellets. Despite my usual enthusiasm for science, (I won the state science fair that year experimenting with the feeding habits of Lumbricus Terrestris (known to laymen as "earthworms")), I was deeply troubled- not so much by the pellet itself, after all, I handled the worms without so much as a murmur- but, as I now believe, by the concept of regurgitation. As my schooling progressed I was introduced to a more sophisticated form of pre-digestion: the textbook.
The difference between reading a textbook and reading the original treatises of, say, Thomas Jefferson is a bit like the difference between appreciating art and creating it. Reading a textbook will at best inform you of someone else
Comments
suggestions welcomed and encouraged.
Habit is the ballast that chains a dog to his vomit. - Samuel Beckett
Any thoughts?
You write beautifully. I'm
You write beautifully.
I'm in awe.
Hooray!
To critical thinkers.
Textbook does not equate the reading of the original text. Ditto.
~hol
St. John's...
I have a friend who went to St. John's undergrad... she is now in the Public Policy grad school here, and just got a fellowship for someplace famous in London (don't know much about public policy schools, sorry I can't be more specific).
In any case, she seems to have loved it, and she's a very interesting person to talk to... it's a unique education.
Karen