HAHA porn sites are such self-parodies :P

swimmerguy's picture

See, just look at this, Ron Jeremy's (the most famous male porn star ever) personal page:
http://ronjeremy.com/contests/be-ron-jeremy-for-halloween.html

Hehe you can be him for Halloween. But look at the porns on the side Tailspin 2- Deliveries In The Rear.
Hehe, it seems like every porno site is practically satirizing themselves.
Like, most of the porn sites I visit there's always some description generically about how people are fucking and blasting hot cum and the shit.
I guess it makes sense, no one wants to buy porn from a dry, depressed, sad sack, they want someone who's excited about their product I guess... However self-parodizing it sounds :P
(By the way, I took the liberty of checking out some of Ron Jeremy's on the side bar :P I must admit, it was really weird, being so used to gay porn as I am, it's like I see a woman sucking on a dick, and I'm like WAIT that's not how it's supposed to work, that's what guys do! and then I realize Oh wait, most people are straight, a guy sucking on another guy's dick is not very straight. Hot, but not straight)

Sorry I haven't been all that present and then I just come up with this porno shit here right off the bat. Maybe I really need to masturbate. I'll probably get to that soon enough here...

Anyway, what have I been doing? Well probably half the reason I've not been posting is that I've been doing jack shit. By that I mean nothing.

That's why I hate breaks, so fucking boring. And then, I have so much time that it's so easy to procrastinate the few things that I really do need to do.
That's kinda weird, I'm much more likely to actually do something if I only just comfortably have enough time to do it, too little, I'll give up, too much, I'll have too much time to procrastinate and I'll never get to it.
Weird.

And then of course I'm just stuck in the house with my parents. I mean, technically my brother's back from college for an extended break because he's not going back to the school, he's going on a foreign study for a semester, and that starts later, so he's here from like a week ago to like the middle of January.
But I did say he's "technically" back, because yeah, he's not really. He has a car that he can use whenever he wants, he has a job to go to most of the day, and he has friends who he hasn't seen in 6 months.
So he's gone basically all day. So I go to swimming early, early in the morning (okay, 7 AM. Early), and then I get back and have quite literally nothing to do...
I mean, doing things with my parents is just kinda awkward, I don't really actually know them that well, so it's just weird to do things with them.
So I've spent a lot of time this break alone.

A lot of that has been re-reading The God Delusion, getting a better understanding of it.
Good book. I've decided what my new religion is, I'm going to become a Pastafarian. I feel like someone else has already mentioned it here, although I did know about it before, (from The God Delusion, as a matter of fact).
Anyway, here's the link to our holy website: http://www.venganza.org/

Pretty delicious, in many ways. We end all of our prayers with "R'amen" :P
And here's a bit of awesome writing...
What these people don’t understand is that He built the world to make us think the earth is older than it really is. For example, a scientist may perform a carbon-dating process on an artifact. He finds that approximately 75% of the Carbon-14 has decayed by electron emission to Nitrogen-14, and infers that this artifact is approximately 10,000 years old, as the half-life of Carbon-14 appears to be 5,730 years. But what our scientist does not realize is that every time he makes a measurement, the Flying Spaghetti Monster is there changing the results with His Noodly Appendage. We have numerous texts that describe in detail how this can be possible and the reasons why He does this. He is of course invisible and can pass through normal matter with ease.

So, so, my thoughts, what have they been? Well obviously nothing interesting, much. There was this interesting thing about morality in The God Delusion, but I think I'm too apathetic to explain it, it was complicated.

Whatever, I will I guess. So, imagine there's a runaway train, and it's on a track about to hit 5 people.
Susan is next to the track, next to a switch. If she flips the switch, the train goes down an alternate track instead, where there's unfortunately a guy stuck.
Would it be morally correct for her to flip the switch?
Most people would say it is.

And so then, imagine that adding on to this, there's a bridge over the track, and the train could be stopped by a very heavy object falling off of it.
Unfortunately, the only heavy object on the bridge is a very fat man, sitting on the edge and enjoying the sunset. Would it be morally acceptable for someone, like Susan, to run up there and push him off, and stop the train, but kill him in the process?
Most people say that's wrong.

But why? Both of them are sacrificing 1 life to save 5 others...
Well, according to Dawkins, it's because when you push off the fat man, you are using him, a rational, thinking, human being, for an end, without his consent. We instinctively don't like that.
But in the other situation, all you're doing is using the alternate track for the same end, and that poor man just happens to be collateral damage.

It's kinda like we feel it would be murder if we actually pushed off the fat man, but when we switch the direction of the train, we're just saving 5 people, and that poor man happens to be in the way, and we can't do anything about it.

Anyway...
So, for the future, for me, I guess, tomorrow, we leave for family in Idaho. That until Monday night, school starts on Tuesday. So, yeah, exciting fucking shit.
And then... Well, better than being at home, at least.
But... I'll get to see CAG. I'll have to ask him for a late Christmas hug :P
I'm sure he'd give one to me :P

I feel like there's new people here, so I should explain CAG, it stands for Cute Asian Guy, cause there's this guy that's cute and Asian, obviously, and he appears to be rather homosexual and into me. So, good stuff.
And I've been thinking about him more than I'd like to admit... >.>

Other than that.... uhhhh... Oh, SHELBY IF YOU'RE READING THIS I'M SORRY WE COULDN'T HANG OUT OVER BREAK, I'LL SEE YOU ON TUESDAY AND I'LL LIKE HAVE TO GO TO YOUR HOUSE SOMETIME SOON.

Uh, and yeah, I might not be back for a few days, sobye :P

Comments

elph's picture

Moral Dilemmas: Would You Kill the Big Guy?

This issue was debated quite extensively on the BBC (~19 months ago). There are many links to the programs and discussion. Here's a good place to start:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/05/100423_will_you_...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/overtoyou/2010/05/programme_trails_would_you_...

****

You missed Draco's birthday? How could you? :)

Anyway... Overcome your propensity towards fatalism and have a great time this weekend in Idaho. It can happen! With any spare time: hone your devious skills and work out the best way for you and CAG to accidentally find each other next Tuesday! Return with a plan in hand (may be a double entendre in there... dunno).

I (we) can't hold my (our) breath much longer! :)

elph's picture

Ron Jeremy?

Who's he?

Those ads in the sidebars appear to be exclusively het... and all asking for money up front! Surely... you didn't bite! :(

The "Batman" video presented a possibility... with Robin... but no!

You're not looking in the right places... :)

socialist's picture

Welcome to the faith, fellow Pastafarian!

I'm a bit of a theologian myself. According to The Random Number of Not Commandments, Suggestions, "Thou ought not consume "cheese" from a green cardboard can, nor ought thou allow such cans into thy homes." Anyway, read the Loose Canon (http://fsm-consortium.com/Loose-Canon-1st-Ed.pdf). I'll see you in heaven with the beer volcano and the stipper factory; perhaps we could be crewmates on our pirate ship.
Your school must be different from mine. At my school, we don't hug people we aren't close friends with. I hug all my male friends (not the female ones), but it would be weird to hug Brad because we aren't very close and I don't know his friends at all.
Also, I feel the same about women giving BJs.

Yamamoto's picture

Oh cool he was on Tosh.O

Oh cool he was on Tosh.O once... :P In a web redemption they set him up as this girls prom date :D

angel syndrome's picture

on the subject of porn, i

on the subject of porn, i usually avoid shit like OHMYGOD HOT LOAD IN THE FACE MMMM BB and watch vintage shit, i'm really down for Cadinot films... while (obviously) depicting subjects of fantasy he usually included his own experiences as well as those of his actors and had a concern for realism, + includes more of a storyline.. I'll PM you some links if you want, it's different than your typical porn.

elph's picture

Cadinot...

Following a very brief visit:

(1) Men/boys are mostly too muscular (=cult of excessive "manliness")
(2) Tattoos and piercings are an immediate "turn off"
(3) Too much facial hair not properly cared for
(4) Very few signs of affection... domination/submission seems central

Fully realizing that few here will agree; sorry!

angel syndrome's picture

hm... aime comme minet is

hm... aime comme minet is still my favorite porno irregardless

1) i don't find them excessively manly, of course the actors are more masculine and this reflects the director's personal preference.

2) i haven't seen a cadinot film with anyone with piercings and tattoos... at least not any of the classic ones?

3) didn't quite notice any obvious facial hair... but see point 1, + cadinot is concerned with realism, people aren't perfect... most men have stubble

4) yes, but, again, is this not realistic? so much of gay sexuality + culture is defined by dominant vs submission, therefore logically gay pornography will have gay culture shown through. it's the same with any other film, porn or not - it reflects the ideologies of the era in which they're made, and the director's point of view on it. in addition, many Cadinot films feature "rape-like" sequences which a lot of people are against (which is what i think you're talking about). however, as i just said, one has to look into the time in which these films were made, where sexuality in general, let alone homosexuality, was kept quiet and by extension was repressed. with repression often going along with violence, it is not surprising that we see a lot of extremely dominant and extremely submissive characters in 20th century gay porn.

(Yes, my film studies education lets me understand the material i masturbate to.)

elph's picture

A very intriguing answer!

Would you please repeat the question?

elph's picture

It's possible that...

...I may have stumbled on to the wrong "Cadinot" site. I didn't spend a lot of time searching... and wasn't about to pay for something that would bore me to tears!

My comments were based largely on the films and trailers advertised in the sidebars... These may not have been produced by Cadinot... dunno!

The porn being advertised (short trailers available), however, seemed to be dedicated to continuous cum-generating automatons encased in tattoos and exaggerated, muscle-bound frames --- and not the slightest hint of affection... only innovative means of achieving orgasm after orgasm! Sad!

What disturbs me is... that young gays (such as here on Oasis) may think that these scenes portray what all self-respecting gay teens are expected to emulate... you're not truly gay if you fail these lessons! Again... so wrong!

****

Correct me if I'm wrong: Young gay teens look for porn to help their envisaging others (preferably of similar age) in the throes of masturbatory euphoria (solo or mutual) or in other acts indicative of genuine mutual affection (e.g., kissing, embraces, bjs, occasionally anal, holding of hands, etc...).

Regrettably, laws imposing puritanism (esp. here in U.S.) make safely accessing such quality works practically impossible!

socialist's picture

On the very rare occasions that I do watch porn,

I just stay with Brent Corrigan videos. Those are great and finding new ones sucks.

elph's picture

A great improvement...

...over the sites on which I commented above!

Again... not sure if I accessed the site that you find particularly efficacious! :)

btw... I note a striking similarity between your avatar and that of the young Corrigan.

socialist's picture

I have noticed that our hair is similar.

I don't think we share any major characteristics other than that. Well, he's never the one I focus on in his movies. And yes, Sean Paul Lockhart is young. He was 16 in his first movies. That's why he used the fake name of Brent Corrigan. He's also appeared in some non-pornographic films, like Milk.

Yamamoto's picture

Like what I would like to

Like what I would like to see this :D

ferrets's picture

heh...

i dont even think hes an attractive person. why is he such a succesfull porn star?

"A loving man and woman in a committed relationship can marry. Dogs, no matter what their relationship, are not allowed to marry. How should society treat gays and lesbians in committed relationships? As dogs or as humans?"

Yamamoto's picture

I can tell you why... One:

I can tell you why...

One: He used to be attractive... being in porn that long does that to you :P... Plus being attractive is not exactlly a requirement especially when it comes to the guys part in stright porn... I mean what stright guy wacthes the porn to see the guy part :P

Two: He is a very prolific porn star... has been in 1700 more films than the guy who comes in second...

Three: 9.75 inch cock... egough said

Four: Probably a cool in person... I mean he appered on Tosh.O and plus he debates with Chirstans to defend porn :P... Oh and he has said "Porn is not as bad as volient video games." I loled at one :P

inso_manic's picture

Lots of time does mean lots of procrastinating...

and lots of porn. My break has been nothing but that it seems >_< And i'm very interested in this religion you speak of, mine isn't really doing much for me...
but then i guess I'M not doing much for IT.